(Hypothetical) Effect of Frequencies (4/5)
MULTIPLE FREQUENCIES AND SWEEP FREQUENCY
So far, the general trend has been to use lower frequencies than the original 30kHz.
A new trend is emerging with hand held zappers :
The increasing number of frequencies available in a zapper.
A zapper using a 555 needs to change some component values to change its frequency. Using a selector, up to 3 frequencies can be easily built. More than 3 becomes a headache increasing the price.
Adding a variable frequency control to a zapper using a 555 will give you more choice, but no more precision : 1% max.
Without the use of a frequency meter , this control giving a 10% of accuracy, is silly . And the frequency meter will add so much to the price, that this arrangement is not viable for a simple zapper.
With the proliferation of “cheap” zappers, using a micro-controller, the overall figure is changing. This trend, popularized by Maestro-Zapper and its MZ5, will certainly spread, with the help of competition.
To my knowledge, Maestro-Zapper has 4 models using affordable micro-controller zappers.
Parazapper has also jumped on this trend, and others will follow.
The precision obtained is less than 1%, and can go as high as 0.01% with the use of a crystal clock, and programs allows an increase of the number of resonant frequencies available.
To mention only these two manufacturers, the CCI of Parazapper offers 9 different frequencies divided into 4 programs.
The MZ3b of Maestro-Zapper, offers 5 different programs, using 6 “frequencies”. Two of these "frequencies" are actually sweep frequencies.
One of these sweep runs on 33 different frequencies around the popular 2.5kHz.
Another sweep runs on 251 different frequencies, between 4kHz and 8kHz, producing countless harmonics each.
So far, the general trend has been to use lower frequencies than the original 30kHz.
A new trend is emerging with hand held zappers :
The increasing number of frequencies available in a zapper.
A zapper using a 555 needs to change some component values to change its frequency. Using a selector, up to 3 frequencies can be easily built. More than 3 becomes a headache increasing the price.
Adding a variable frequency control to a zapper using a 555 will give you more choice, but no more precision : 1% max.
Without the use of a frequency meter , this control giving a 10% of accuracy, is silly . And the frequency meter will add so much to the price, that this arrangement is not viable for a simple zapper.
With the proliferation of “cheap” zappers, using a micro-controller, the overall figure is changing. This trend, popularized by Maestro-Zapper and its MZ5, will certainly spread, with the help of competition.
To my knowledge, Maestro-Zapper has 4 models using affordable micro-controller zappers.
Parazapper has also jumped on this trend, and others will follow.
The precision obtained is less than 1%, and can go as high as 0.01% with the use of a crystal clock, and programs allows an increase of the number of resonant frequencies available.
To mention only these two manufacturers, the CCI of Parazapper offers 9 different frequencies divided into 4 programs.
The MZ3b of Maestro-Zapper, offers 5 different programs, using 6 “frequencies”. Two of these "frequencies" are actually sweep frequencies.
One of these sweep runs on 33 different frequencies around the popular 2.5kHz.
Another sweep runs on 251 different frequencies, between 4kHz and 8kHz, producing countless harmonics each.
Dr. Clark has used this technique (sweep frequency) before finding the wide effect of direct current.
p. 14 of his book TCFAD:
In 1993 my son joined me Jeoffrey and we tried a new approach. He programmed a frequency generator emitted by all parsites, viruses and bacteria, 290kHz to 470kHz. It took about 3 minutes to cover each 1kHz. It was more effective, but this required ten hours of zapping.
Once again the results were disappointing.
Other tests have led to a zapping time of 26h non-stop
The idea of "spread" frequencies, instead of targeting with precision only one, is in the air for quite some time, and yet, no commercial zapper has explored this avenue with success. 10 hours for a zapping session is a long time!
And the supplement of price made it difficult to accept.
The situation is changing with the popular use of uC
On the other hand, if 2.5kHz has still enough energy to affect parasites, with only 7 minutes sessions, as practical experience suggests, there is may be something to do. Especially with the large number of parasites affected by harmonics, spaced at 5kHz with this 2.5kHz frequency!
Dr. Clark has used direct sinusoidal frequencies for 3 minutes each, spaced of 1kHz, to have a good coverage, but total time was very long.
Maestro-Zapper uses square wave sub-harmonic frequencies, one after the other, in a constant roll.
Harmonics spread many pathogens simultaneously with each frequency.
If time is short (7 minutes, for example), the zapper will operate with only the basic effect of DC current.
If the exposure time is long (30 minutes or more - estimated), the continuous roll of sweeps (75 times per second with 2.5kHz, 46 times per second with VF) finally work on all the parasites (or most of them, depending on the band of the sweep).
Here is an example of a narrow frequency sweep, around 2.5kHz, like the one made by the MZ3b, MZ5b or MZ_UZ of Maestro-Zapper.
p. 14 of his book TCFAD:
In 1993 my son joined me Jeoffrey and we tried a new approach. He programmed a frequency generator emitted by all parsites, viruses and bacteria, 290kHz to 470kHz. It took about 3 minutes to cover each 1kHz. It was more effective, but this required ten hours of zapping.
Once again the results were disappointing.
Other tests have led to a zapping time of 26h non-stop
The idea of "spread" frequencies, instead of targeting with precision only one, is in the air for quite some time, and yet, no commercial zapper has explored this avenue with success. 10 hours for a zapping session is a long time!
And the supplement of price made it difficult to accept.
The situation is changing with the popular use of uC
On the other hand, if 2.5kHz has still enough energy to affect parasites, with only 7 minutes sessions, as practical experience suggests, there is may be something to do. Especially with the large number of parasites affected by harmonics, spaced at 5kHz with this 2.5kHz frequency!
Dr. Clark has used direct sinusoidal frequencies for 3 minutes each, spaced of 1kHz, to have a good coverage, but total time was very long.
Maestro-Zapper uses square wave sub-harmonic frequencies, one after the other, in a constant roll.
Harmonics spread many pathogens simultaneously with each frequency.
If time is short (7 minutes, for example), the zapper will operate with only the basic effect of DC current.
If the exposure time is long (30 minutes or more - estimated), the continuous roll of sweeps (75 times per second with 2.5kHz, 46 times per second with VF) finally work on all the parasites (or most of them, depending on the band of the sweep).
Here is an example of a narrow frequency sweep, around 2.5kHz, like the one made by the MZ3b, MZ5b or MZ_UZ of Maestro-Zapper.
Nominal frequencies generated by the 2.5kHz sweep. Frequencies in Hz
2522 2519 2516 2513 2509 2506 2503 2500 2497 2494 2491 2488 2484 2481 2478 2475 2472 2469 2466 2463 2460 2457 2454 2451 2448 2445 2442 2439 2436 2433 2430 2427 2424 And all stats over again : 2522 2519 2516 2513...
Everyone of these frequencies will make a high number of odd and even harmonics, due to the very long duty cycle of the wave form (D/C = 93.5%).
Sweep Frequency
If we take the “pathogen frequency chart” of Dr Clark as reference, what is the relationship between a “low” frequency, its harmonics, and the resonant frequency of a pathogen?
As an academic example, we will take the Influenza A & B (Flu A and B)
Low Frequency: 313 350Hz High Frequency: 323 900Hz Average frequency: 320 000Hz
1st approximation with low frequency sweep "2500Hz"
Original frequency divided by the average of 2500Hz : 2475Hz (2424Hz to 2522Hz)
320000Hz: 2475Hz = 129.29 times or closest odd harmonic: 129
Harmonics 125 to 133 will be tried, to get an idea. Only odd harmonics will be taken in account, even if the elongated Duty Cycle of 93.5% used produces many odd and even harmonics.
We will consider here, only odd harmonics.
Low Limit: 313,350: 125 = 2506Hz High Limit: 323,900: 125 = 2591Hz
Low Limit: 313,350: 127 = 2467Hz High Limit: 323,900: 127 = 2543Hz
Low Limit: 313,350: 129 = 2429Hz High Limit: 323,900: 129 = 2510Hz
Low Limit: 313,350: 131 = 2392Hz High Limit: 323,900: 131 = 2472Hz
Low Limit: 313,350: 133 = 2356Hz High Limit: 323,900: 133 = 2435Hz
Frequencies affecting the Flu pathogen:
Harmonic 125: Between 2506 and 2591 = 6 frequencies
2522 Hz 2519 Hz 2516 Hz 2513 Hz 2509 Hz 2506 Hz
Harmonic 127: Between 2467 and 2543 = 18 frequencies
2522 Hz 2519 Hz 2516 Hz 2513 Hz 2509 Hz 2506 Hz 2503 Hz 2500 Hz 2497 Hz 2494 Hz 2491 Hz 2488 Hz 2484 Hz 2481 Hz 2478 Hz 2475 Hz 2472 Hz 2469 Hz
Harmonic 129: Between 2429Hz and 2510Hz: 27 frequencies
2509 Hz 2506 Hz 2503 Hz 2500 Hz 2497 Hz 2494 Hz 2491 Hz 2488 Hz 2484 Hz 2481 Hz 2478 Hz 2475 Hz 2472 Hz 2469 Hz 2466 Hz 2463 Hz 2460 Hz 2457 Hz 2454 Hz 2451 Hz 2448 Hz 2445 Hz 2442 Hz 2439 Hz 2436 Hz 2433 Hz 2430 Hz
Harmonic 131: Between 2392Hz and 2472Hz: 17 frequencies
2472 Hz 2469 Hz 2466 Hz 2463 Hz 2460 Hz 2457 Hz 2454 Hz 2451 Hz 2448 Hz 2445 Hz 2442 Hz 2439 Hz 2436 Hz 2433 Hz 2430 Hz 2427 Hz 2424 Hz
Harmonic 133: Between 2399Hz and 2435Hz: 4 frequencies
2433 Hz 2430 Hz 2427 Hz 2424 Hz
Note that some frequencies, as 2472Hz, or 2430Hz, or 2506Hz, hits the same pathogen band with many harmonics, increasing efficiency.
For a nominal total of 6+18+27+17+4 = 72 hits in a single scan of 33 frequencies!
Narrow sweep around 2.5kHz
33 frequencies from 2424Hz to 2522Hz
33 frequencies from 2424Hz to 2522Hz
Let us make a similar calculation with Candida albicans
Low Limit: 384.2kHz Upper limit: 388.4kHz Average: 386kHz
386kHz / 2.475kHz = 155.9. Lets use harmonics 151, 153, 155, 157, 159, 161
Harmonic 151 == 2544 & 2572 ==> 0
Harmonic 153 == 2511 & 2538 ==> 4
2522 2519 2516 2513
Harmonic 155 == 2478 & 2505 ==> 9
2503 2500 2497 2494 2491 2488 2484 2481 2478
Harmonic 157 == 2447 & 2473 ==> 9
2472 2469 2466 2463 2460 2457 2454 2451
Harmonic 159 == 2416 & 2442 ==> 7
2442 2439 2436 2433 2430 2427 2424
Harmonic 161 == 2386 & 2412 ==> 0
Total of harmonics : 29 out of a total of 33 frequencies
Nominal frequencies generated by the FV sweep frequency of the MZ3b, between 8000Hz and 4000Hz, for a total of 251 frequencies. Frequencies in Hz
8000 7968 7937 7905 7874 7843 7813 7782 7752 7722 7692 7663 7634 7605 7576 7547 7519 7491 7463 7435 7407 7380 7353 7326 7299 7273 7246 7220 7194 7168 7143 7117 7092 7067 7042 7018 6993 6969 6944 6920 6897 6873 6849 6826 6803 6780 6757 6734 6711 6689 6667 6645 6623 6601 6579 6557 6536 6515 6494 6472 6452 6431 6410 6390 6369 6349 6329 6309 6289 6270 6250 6231 6211 6192 6173 6154 6135 6116 6098 6079 6061 6042 6024 6006 5988 5970 5952 5935 5917 5900 5882 5865 5848 5831 5814 5797 5780 5764 5747 5731 5714 5698 5682 5666 5650 5634 5618 5602 5587 5571 5556 5540 5525 5510 5495 5479 5464 5450 5435 5420 5405 5391 5376 5362 5348 5333 5319 5305 5291 5277 5263 5249 5236 5222 5208 5195 5181 5168 5155 5141 5128 5115 5102 5089 5076 5063 5051 5038 5025 5013 5000 4988 4975 4963 4950 4938 4926 4914 4902 4890 4878 4866 4854 4843 4831 4819 4808 4796 4785 4773 4762 4751 4739 4728 4717 4706 4695 4684 4673 4662 4651 4640 4630 4619 4608 4598 4587 4577 4566 4556 4545 4535 4525 4515 4505 4494 4484 4474 4464 4454 4444 4435 4425 4415 4405 4396 4386 4376 4367 4357 4348 4338 4329 4320 4310 4301 4292 4283 4274 4264 4255 4246 4237 4228 4219 4211 4202 4193 4184 4175 4167 4158 4149 4141 4132 4124 4115 4107 4098 4090 4082 4073 4065 4057 4049 4040 4032 4024 4016 4008 4000
And all over starts again : 8000 7968 7937... ...
Everyone of these frequencies will make a high number of odd and even harmonics, due to the very long duty cycle of the wave form (D/C = 80 to 90%).
Some zapper manufacturers use very precise frequency generators (0.01% and better) to aim at specific pathogen frequencies. There is so much to choice from, that laboratory generators needs to be used - or the use of modules, one module for every specific pathogen family. Expensive!
1_ With this sweep frequency, we exchange precision for dispersion. If the aimed frequency is a little bit “wrong”, the dispersion will compensate for it anyway.
2_ For the same reason, we don’t need a high accuracy oscillator (expensive!) A 1% will be sufficient.
3_ By rendering the scan a little bit more wide than needed for a specific frequency, we will hit many other pathogens at the same time, increasing the efficiency of this technique.
Some minor drawback are present :
1_ The programming implementation in real time of this sweep is not easy, but feasible.
Result are there to prove this fact.
2_ This dispersion technique reduces (sometimes) the efficiency of the hitting process and will need more exposition time (14mn to 90mn) than a single, ultra precise frequency. (3mn)
3_ All this complexity has a price tag, and price is more “substantial” than a simple basic zapper, using a 555.
It still remains much lower that a module-built zapper or high precision lab generator.
I expect that this technique will become increasingly popular with the advent of common use of micro-controllers in zapper field.
This is a difference a hunter can easily understand :
Between taking a flying sparrow with a 22LR (precision of a single frequency) and a #12 gauge gun (imprecision and scatter), the chances of catching the poor sparrow are significantly higher with the #12, although I don’t know precisely which ( s) lead (s) will hit it.
The effectiveness of this method of narrow scanning around the frequency of 2500Hz is ... positively surprising for a large number of pathogen frequencies listed by Dr. Clark.
Have fun aiming at the pathogen target of your choice.
Now I encourage you to make a similar calculation with the 251 different frequencies generated by FV between 4kHz and 8kHz. (;-)
Let's make a similar calculation with Lyme (Borrelia burgdorferi)
Lower limit: 378.95kHz Upper limit: 382kHz Average: 380kHz
380kHz / 2.475kHz = 154.3. Lets use harmonics 149, 151, 153, 155, 157, 159
Harmonic 149 == 2543 & 2563 ==> 0
Harmonic 151 == 2509 & 2530 ==> 5
2522 2519 2516 2513 2509
Harmonic 153 == 2476 & 2497 ==> 7
2497 2494 2491 2488 2484 2481 2478
Harmonic 155 == 2445 & 2464 ==> 7
2463 2460 2457 2454 2451 2448 2445
Harmonic 157 == 2413 & 2433 ==> 4
2433 2430 2427 2424
Harmonic 159 == 2383 & 2402 ==> 0
Total harmonic 23 of a total of 33 frequencies
A last time, a similar calculation with the infamous intestinal fluke Fasciolopsis buskii
Low Limit: 427.7kHz Upper limit: 435.1kHz Average: 434kHz
434kHz / 2.475kHz = 175.4. Lets use harmonics 171, 173, 175, 177, 179
Harmonic 171 == 2501 & 2544 ==> 7
2522 2519 2516 2513 2509 2506 2503
Harmonic 173 == 2472 & 2515 ==> 14
2513 2509 2506 2503 2500 2497 2494 2491 2488 2484 2481 2478 2475 2472
Harmonic 175 == 2444 & 2486 ==> 14
2484 2481 2478 2475 2472 2469 2466 2463 2460 2457 2454 2451 2448 2445
Harmonic 177 == 2416 & 2458 ==> 12
2457 2454 2451 2448 2445 2442 2439 2436 2433 2430 2427 2424
Harmonic 179 == 2389 & 2430 ==> 3
2430 2427 2424
Harmonic 169 ? Lets see...
Harmonic 169 == 2530 & 2574 ==> 0
Total harmonic 50 of a total of 33 frequencies
Legal disclaimer :
We do not prescribe, diagnose, or make any medical claim or advices.
The principles, assumptions or theories exposed here have no medical or scientific value officially recognized.
Please note that Dr Clark’s books or devices have not been evaluated by Health Canada (Canada) or Food and Drugs Administration (USA), and then, have not received any guarantee on their effectiveness or their safety.
Zappers can only be sold or used as experimental devices for educational research. They are not intended for use in the cure, treatment, prevention, diagnostic of any disease.
If illness is an issue, please consult a licensed health professional before attempting any self health program.
By using this information without the approval of a licensed health professional, you are prescribing for yourself, as permitted by law, and you take full responsibility for the results.
These results may vary depending on individuals
We do not prescribe, diagnose, or make any medical claim or advices.
The principles, assumptions or theories exposed here have no medical or scientific value officially recognized.
Please note that Dr Clark’s books or devices have not been evaluated by Health Canada (Canada) or Food and Drugs Administration (USA), and then, have not received any guarantee on their effectiveness or their safety.
Zappers can only be sold or used as experimental devices for educational research. They are not intended for use in the cure, treatment, prevention, diagnostic of any disease.
If illness is an issue, please consult a licensed health professional before attempting any self health program.
By using this information without the approval of a licensed health professional, you are prescribing for yourself, as permitted by law, and you take full responsibility for the results.
These results may vary depending on individuals
Certain Internet sites associate zapper and serious illness.
It is not our role to make such assertions.
Illness does not interest us.
We leave it to the experts of the unhealthy states.
We are only interested to feel better, which is highly subjective, and to get rid of as much “invaders” who drain our resources, as possible.
These invaders, who live at our expense, we name them under the generic name of “parasites”.
We experience the influence of the zapper effect
on these parasites, on a hypothetical and empirical basis, which have nothing to do with medical or scientific rules.
It is not our role to make such assertions.
Illness does not interest us.
We leave it to the experts of the unhealthy states.
We are only interested to feel better, which is highly subjective, and to get rid of as much “invaders” who drain our resources, as possible.
These invaders, who live at our expense, we name them under the generic name of “parasites”.
We experience the influence of the zapper effect
on these parasites, on a hypothetical and empirical basis, which have nothing to do with medical or scientific rules.
The first page talks about H. Clark’s original zapper and its 30kHz frequency, and why it is so important for a zapper to have at least this frequency.
The second page talks about the zapper really working with frequencies, why each “expert” has its own pet frequency, and why it is so difficult to choose among all frequencies from Rife, Clark, Beck and many others.
2.5kHz
Frequencies and parasites
The third page talks about zapping frequencies “whispering” to the brain
15Hz VLF
VLF What they are
VLF-How it works
The fourth page is about an actual trend : the multiplication of proposed frequencies, and also about the sweep frequency and what it's so special with it
Narrow Sweep
Influenza A&B
Candida albicans
Lyme
Fasciolopsis buskii
Wide FV Sweep
The fifth page is a technical reference for all other pages.
Qualities of a frequency
Other frequencies used in a zapper
Resonant frequency
Harmonics
Duty cycle
Skin effect
