Exaggerated Publicity : Lexicon
There is a tendency to exaggeration out-there, highly misleading those looking for honest information. Do not hesitate to ask questions, if in doubt,
or if it looks too beautiful to be true
There is a tendency to exaggeration out-there, highly misleading those looking for honest information. Do not hesitate to ask questions, if in doubt,
or if it looks too beautiful to be true
With a 555 zapper, when you use a specific frequency for its virtues, you need PRECISION :
When H. Clark discovered the large effect of her zapper, she stated :
"... it was not due to some unique design, or special wave form produced by the device. It was due to battery operation!"
This point leaded to "any frequency (anything from 10 to 500 000Hz) wil do".
Frequencies can have a positive impact on the use of a zapper, if you know wich frequency to use and how to use-it. This use of frequency needs PRECISION. Capacitors with 20% error and resistors with an additional 5% will remove the advantage of using a frequency in particular.
Some sellers says (invoking a "skin effect"), without any proof, that lower frequencies have a "better penetration" on zappers. Why they stop at 2.5kHz, instead of going lower? Mystery!
Read "What about the popular "skin effect"?" page for more information
Read "Effect of Frequencies" page for more information
When H. Clark discovered the large effect of her zapper, she stated :
"... it was not due to some unique design, or special wave form produced by the device. It was due to battery operation!"
This point leaded to "any frequency (anything from 10 to 500 000Hz) wil do".
Frequencies can have a positive impact on the use of a zapper, if you know wich frequency to use and how to use-it. This use of frequency needs PRECISION. Capacitors with 20% error and resistors with an additional 5% will remove the advantage of using a frequency in particular.
Some sellers says (invoking a "skin effect"), without any proof, that lower frequencies have a "better penetration" on zappers. Why they stop at 2.5kHz, instead of going lower? Mystery!
Read "What about the popular "skin effect"?" page for more information
Read "Effect of Frequencies" page for more information
Continuous output : Good to have-it. Not always wanted for a friendly use
Most of the arguments around this point are exagerated when related to dayly use (the more common case).
The 7-20 sequence recommended by Dr Clark makes a lot of sense and is very efficient on most situations.
Having to check a clock to make this sequence is seen by many as "cumbersome", because we are not used to make ANY KIND OF EFFORT. That's why a continuous sequence (used by Dr Clark on "heavy cases" only) is so popular.
Being able to change the 7-20 sequence is nice if you are making a lot of research, or, if being a professional of health, you want to fine-tune the use of a zapper to a specific, difficult case.
It is rarely used by most of us because we want a friendly use of the zapper.
Continuous output is a good technical solution when you want to make a "cheap" zapper (by cheap, I means low design and production cost, obviously not sales price).
Automatic 7-20 sequence (or any other automatic sequence) is very handily most of the time, but its use is cast on this only sequence.
Having both options will give you the best of both uses.
Most of the arguments around this point are exagerated when related to dayly use (the more common case).
The 7-20 sequence recommended by Dr Clark makes a lot of sense and is very efficient on most situations.
Having to check a clock to make this sequence is seen by many as "cumbersome", because we are not used to make ANY KIND OF EFFORT. That's why a continuous sequence (used by Dr Clark on "heavy cases" only) is so popular.
Being able to change the 7-20 sequence is nice if you are making a lot of research, or, if being a professional of health, you want to fine-tune the use of a zapper to a specific, difficult case.
It is rarely used by most of us because we want a friendly use of the zapper.
Continuous output is a good technical solution when you want to make a "cheap" zapper (by cheap, I means low design and production cost, obviously not sales price).
Automatic 7-20 sequence (or any other automatic sequence) is very handily most of the time, but its use is cast on this only sequence.
Having both options will give you the best of both uses.
Stabilized Wawe, Constant High Conductivity and alike
This feature is advocated by many, as a result of the BIGGER IS BETTEERRR!
This feature increases the easy injection of high frequencies (used on harmonics) and decreases the internal dynamic impedance to almost 0. It increases too the peak-to-peak voltage applied to you. When this "stabilized wave" circuit uses a small internal resistor's value, you have a zapper without any internal control of the delivered current.
Making you believe that this is a "superior feature" on a zapper is like making you believe that having a car without brakes makes-it a superior car.
There is a very good (more complex) solution to this : Constant Current Source
This feature is advocated by many, as a result of the BIGGER IS BETTEERRR!
This feature increases the easy injection of high frequencies (used on harmonics) and decreases the internal dynamic impedance to almost 0. It increases too the peak-to-peak voltage applied to you. When this "stabilized wave" circuit uses a small internal resistor's value, you have a zapper without any internal control of the delivered current.
Making you believe that this is a "superior feature" on a zapper is like making you believe that having a car without brakes makes-it a superior car.
There is a very good (more complex) solution to this : Constant Current Source
Using a wall plug adapter in a zapper is a call for disaster.
Battery only : Best protection of your life.
You can use your zapper with all the freedom you need, too.
I understand that a wall plug power supply is an excellent solution for many electrical devices.
I understand too that, when the device is in direct electrical contact with the user, using anything else but a low voltage battery is playing a mortal game.
Using a revolver loaded with only one bullet, spinning the chambers and firing-it on your temple, or using a zapper's connected to the wall plug is the same game. Only odd numbers are different.
Hospitals and doctors can play this game. They are legally protected. But accidents still happen with double insulation transformers, and UL/CSA approved apparatus.
For sure, batteries cost more, on the very long run ...
If the 0.5 to 3 cents cost of a zapper's session is a mandatory point on the choice of your zapper, we have there an interesting problem of priorities, hard to zap!
Go to this Bench Test page to see by yourself, where this point can lead to... Scarry!
Battery only : Best protection of your life.
You can use your zapper with all the freedom you need, too.
I understand that a wall plug power supply is an excellent solution for many electrical devices.
I understand too that, when the device is in direct electrical contact with the user, using anything else but a low voltage battery is playing a mortal game.
Using a revolver loaded with only one bullet, spinning the chambers and firing-it on your temple, or using a zapper's connected to the wall plug is the same game. Only odd numbers are different.
Hospitals and doctors can play this game. They are legally protected. But accidents still happen with double insulation transformers, and UL/CSA approved apparatus.
For sure, batteries cost more, on the very long run ...
If the 0.5 to 3 cents cost of a zapper's session is a mandatory point on the choice of your zapper, we have there an interesting problem of priorities, hard to zap!
Go to this Bench Test page to see by yourself, where this point can lead to... Scarry!
Using stainless steel on electrodes
Because zappers are using a Direct Current for their work, we have two distinct flows :
1_ An electronic flow made out of negative charges (electrons), going from the negative output to the positive output THROUGH YOU.
2_ A less known flow of positive charges (positively charged ions, made out of the material composition of the positive electrode), flowing from the positive electrode to the negative electrode, THROUGH YOU. Electrolysis and electroplating uses this phenomenon to their advantage. Irritated skin is another side effect of this flow going always on the same direction.
Any metal in direct contact with the skin will release positively charged molecules IN your body. This is one of the reasons why Dr Clark always recommended to use a wet kitchen paper between electrodes and your body.
The interesting part of this issue now : Composition of a general purpose Stainless Steel (302 grade) :
Iron : around 72%; Chromium : 16-18%; Nickel : 8-10%; Manganese : 2%
On the other hand, composition of C11000 copper : 99.90% copper.
Which one would you use, with your zapper, knowing that both Nickel and Chromium are classified as tissue irritants and carcinogenic?
About conductivity :
Copper has a resistivity of 0.017_uOhm*m
Iron has a resistivity of 0.1_uOhm*m
Even when not shiny, copper is a much better conductor than iron or stainless could be.
Because zappers are using a Direct Current for their work, we have two distinct flows :
1_ An electronic flow made out of negative charges (electrons), going from the negative output to the positive output THROUGH YOU.
2_ A less known flow of positive charges (positively charged ions, made out of the material composition of the positive electrode), flowing from the positive electrode to the negative electrode, THROUGH YOU. Electrolysis and electroplating uses this phenomenon to their advantage. Irritated skin is another side effect of this flow going always on the same direction.
Any metal in direct contact with the skin will release positively charged molecules IN your body. This is one of the reasons why Dr Clark always recommended to use a wet kitchen paper between electrodes and your body.
The interesting part of this issue now : Composition of a general purpose Stainless Steel (302 grade) :
Iron : around 72%; Chromium : 16-18%; Nickel : 8-10%; Manganese : 2%
On the other hand, composition of C11000 copper : 99.90% copper.
Which one would you use, with your zapper, knowing that both Nickel and Chromium are classified as tissue irritants and carcinogenic?
About conductivity :
Copper has a resistivity of 0.017_uOhm*m
Iron has a resistivity of 0.1_uOhm*m
Even when not shiny, copper is a much better conductor than iron or stainless could be.
Blood electrification :
ALL H. Clark zappers uses blood and lymph as main current channels.
Clark's zappers are designed for wide electrification of "anything" crossing the path of current.
Beck's Zapper is a tool specifically designed for blood electrification, and it does-it very well.
At this chapter, "anything" including blood could be directly related to current flow.
Our experiences demonstrates that a 30kHz 57% duty cycle has a superior current flow to a 2.5kHz 94% duty cycle.
ALL H. Clark zappers uses blood and lymph as main current channels.
Clark's zappers are designed for wide electrification of "anything" crossing the path of current.
Beck's Zapper is a tool specifically designed for blood electrification, and it does-it very well.
At this chapter, "anything" including blood could be directly related to current flow.
Our experiences demonstrates that a 30kHz 57% duty cycle has a superior current flow to a 2.5kHz 94% duty cycle.
Electroporation :
In our opinion, this word is wrongly used with zappers.
Why? :
Please, read this interesting article, written by Michael Forrest
http://www.toolsforhealing.com/CD/Articles/Q/QuestionsAnswersabouttheB.html
Extract :
Why does Bob Beck and other device manufacturers claim that these devices cause electroporation? Because Beck mistakenly thought that the high-absorption effect was electroporation without studying the science journals enough to realize that it couldn't be electroporation which is a very severe and unwanted effect.
What is electroporation? It is a temporary condition of the outer membrane of blood cells becoming "porous" as a result of high electric fields affecting the cells. While the cells are porous, normally unwanted fluid & substances can enter into the blood cell with resultant disturbing effects. This man-made effect is useful to scientists though, which is why there are companies like Genetronics which manufacture laboratory instruments which induce electroporation. It should be a great relief to all to know that these blood electrification devices do not produce an effect so extreme as electroporation.
What is the evidence that the high-absorption effect is not electroporation? Brian Austin, Technical Support Manager at Genetronics (an electroporation device company), emailed me concerning the Black Box that "with the (electrical) conditions used, there should be no electroporation effects. Field strengths are not high enough." J. C. Weaver of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in his report on electroporation published in the Journal of Cellular Biochemistry (51:426-435 1993) reported "In the case of isolated cells, mammalian cells experience electroporation for electric fields of about E=1kv/cm (1000 volts with a distance of 1 centimeter between electrodes) for short pulses." The Black Box produces about 1.35 volts per centimeter when the electrodes are placed on the same wrist. Another electroporation device manufacturer, Cyto Pulse Sciences, stated on their website (in the equipment tutorial) that red blood cells need 1430 volts per centimeter for electroporation.
What is the evidence that the blood cells are more absorptive during electrification? In the Biophysics Journal, Vol. 58 Oct 1990, pages 897-903 the authors wrote that "...electric fields that generate transmembrane potential in the range of millivolts are capable of activating membrane transport systems." (The Black Box creates a potential across the blood cell membranes of millivolts.) Also; "...reversible activation of certain membrane channels or transport systems may be achieved using low-amplitude, low frequency alternating current fields. Electric fields as small as 16 volts per centimeter have been shown to induce membrane conductance, and these effects were completely reversible. Human erythrocytes treated with such ac fields for hours were shown to have normal shape, volume, and permeabilities to potassium and sodium."
What is the best time to use the Blood Purifier? Because of high-absorption it is best to use it when your blood stream has the least amount of potentially toxic byproducts of metabolism in it, which is when you awaken from sleep. Second best time would be right before going to bed.
In plain words, there is a "magnification" of inter cellular exchanges when they are excited by a very tiny voltage, as these produced by zappers (whatever kind of zapper, not only ultimate ones).
Thanks, Mr Forrest
In our opinion, this word is wrongly used with zappers.
Why? :
Please, read this interesting article, written by Michael Forrest
http://www.toolsforhealing.com/CD/Articles/Q/QuestionsAnswersabouttheB.html
Extract :
Why does Bob Beck and other device manufacturers claim that these devices cause electroporation? Because Beck mistakenly thought that the high-absorption effect was electroporation without studying the science journals enough to realize that it couldn't be electroporation which is a very severe and unwanted effect.
What is electroporation? It is a temporary condition of the outer membrane of blood cells becoming "porous" as a result of high electric fields affecting the cells. While the cells are porous, normally unwanted fluid & substances can enter into the blood cell with resultant disturbing effects. This man-made effect is useful to scientists though, which is why there are companies like Genetronics which manufacture laboratory instruments which induce electroporation. It should be a great relief to all to know that these blood electrification devices do not produce an effect so extreme as electroporation.
What is the evidence that the high-absorption effect is not electroporation? Brian Austin, Technical Support Manager at Genetronics (an electroporation device company), emailed me concerning the Black Box that "with the (electrical) conditions used, there should be no electroporation effects. Field strengths are not high enough." J. C. Weaver of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in his report on electroporation published in the Journal of Cellular Biochemistry (51:426-435 1993) reported "In the case of isolated cells, mammalian cells experience electroporation for electric fields of about E=1kv/cm (1000 volts with a distance of 1 centimeter between electrodes) for short pulses." The Black Box produces about 1.35 volts per centimeter when the electrodes are placed on the same wrist. Another electroporation device manufacturer, Cyto Pulse Sciences, stated on their website (in the equipment tutorial) that red blood cells need 1430 volts per centimeter for electroporation.
What is the evidence that the blood cells are more absorptive during electrification? In the Biophysics Journal, Vol. 58 Oct 1990, pages 897-903 the authors wrote that "...electric fields that generate transmembrane potential in the range of millivolts are capable of activating membrane transport systems." (The Black Box creates a potential across the blood cell membranes of millivolts.) Also; "...reversible activation of certain membrane channels or transport systems may be achieved using low-amplitude, low frequency alternating current fields. Electric fields as small as 16 volts per centimeter have been shown to induce membrane conductance, and these effects were completely reversible. Human erythrocytes treated with such ac fields for hours were shown to have normal shape, volume, and permeabilities to potassium and sodium."
What is the best time to use the Blood Purifier? Because of high-absorption it is best to use it when your blood stream has the least amount of potentially toxic byproducts of metabolism in it, which is when you awaken from sleep. Second best time would be right before going to bed.
In plain words, there is a "magnification" of inter cellular exchanges when they are excited by a very tiny voltage, as these produced by zappers (whatever kind of zapper, not only ultimate ones).
Thanks, Mr Forrest
Aura Expansion : We have here a very interesting claim!
Aura is a multi layer of energy surrounding ANY energized "device". If you are curious enough, you can see this aura around high voltage electric lines, when light is very low.
On alive beings (plants, animals, humans) this same energetic field can be seen.
The more complex the being, the more complex the aura. The "emotional body" heavelly modifies the Aura.
Children can see them quite easily. University graduates can't, most of the time (What has been lost?!?).
Aura takes a "bad" color when a portion of the body is loosing health.
It turns dark when illness installs on the physic body.
The flow of the right amount of electricity removes dark spots and brings bright color to the aura, releasing a powerful expansion.
This expansion will remain for hours and then shrinks slowly. Many electrical treatments will maintain an expanded aura.
This happens when using a zapper (any kind of zapper) properly.
ALL ZAPPERS EXPANDS THE AURA.
Aura is a multi layer of energy surrounding ANY energized "device". If you are curious enough, you can see this aura around high voltage electric lines, when light is very low.
On alive beings (plants, animals, humans) this same energetic field can be seen.
The more complex the being, the more complex the aura. The "emotional body" heavelly modifies the Aura.
Children can see them quite easily. University graduates can't, most of the time (What has been lost?!?).
Aura takes a "bad" color when a portion of the body is loosing health.
It turns dark when illness installs on the physic body.
The flow of the right amount of electricity removes dark spots and brings bright color to the aura, releasing a powerful expansion.
This expansion will remain for hours and then shrinks slowly. Many electrical treatments will maintain an expanded aura.
This happens when using a zapper (any kind of zapper) properly.
ALL ZAPPERS EXPANDS THE AURA.
Trial and warranties :
They are as useful as the honesty of the dealer is. On a well made zapper, a warranty is only a "peace of mind" making you sleep better.
1 year of warranty is good on an electronic device without moving parts.
Most of the times, if it works for 3 months, it will work for a looong time.
3 years of warranty is VERY good, if the manufacturer has a good reputation for at least 5 years.
A lifetime warranty has a linguistic catch : Lifetime of what, or whom?
Very good on publicity, will no stand longuer than the company's life, and companies (stop dreaming) don't last for ever.
Be careful : When it is too beautiful to be true, it is because... it is too beautiful to be true.
They are as useful as the honesty of the dealer is. On a well made zapper, a warranty is only a "peace of mind" making you sleep better.
1 year of warranty is good on an electronic device without moving parts.
Most of the times, if it works for 3 months, it will work for a looong time.
3 years of warranty is VERY good, if the manufacturer has a good reputation for at least 5 years.
A lifetime warranty has a linguistic catch : Lifetime of what, or whom?
Very good on publicity, will no stand longuer than the company's life, and companies (stop dreaming) don't last for ever.
Be careful : When it is too beautiful to be true, it is because... it is too beautiful to be true.
Second frequency : A basic zapper will give very interesting results with only one frequency, because frequency is used to transfer electric charges through the skin barrier (mostly capacitive).
For the H. Clark zapper's effect to work (tiny direct currents flowing through you), around 30kHz is the best frequency.
If you start playing with Mortal Oscillatory Rates (Frequencies using resonant phenomenon to disable parasites), then you have the sniper's motto translation as : "One frequency, one parasite".
By using lower, more easy frequencies to make, you can play some games with harmonics.
By practical results, it seems that 2 to 5 kHz are good frequencies to try and experiment.
Whatever the frequency you use, this frequency will be good for some parasites, and ineffective for many.
You cannot have a a magical "fit-for-all" frequency. But you can have a "magical though" leading to disillusion.
Frequencies are like screwdrivers in your toolbox : Which one do you think will do "all the jobs"?
Stop listening to people selling only one kind of magical screwdriver.
What your good sense tells you : Only one screwdriver is the best choice, or two different ones could be an even better choice? (What about 200?)
For the H. Clark zapper's effect to work (tiny direct currents flowing through you), around 30kHz is the best frequency.
If you start playing with Mortal Oscillatory Rates (Frequencies using resonant phenomenon to disable parasites), then you have the sniper's motto translation as : "One frequency, one parasite".
By using lower, more easy frequencies to make, you can play some games with harmonics.
By practical results, it seems that 2 to 5 kHz are good frequencies to try and experiment.
Whatever the frequency you use, this frequency will be good for some parasites, and ineffective for many.
You cannot have a a magical "fit-for-all" frequency. But you can have a "magical though" leading to disillusion.
Frequencies are like screwdrivers in your toolbox : Which one do you think will do "all the jobs"?
Stop listening to people selling only one kind of magical screwdriver.
What your good sense tells you : Only one screwdriver is the best choice, or two different ones could be an even better choice? (What about 200?)
2.5kHz penetrates 3.5 better than 30kHz
My frequency is better than yours
Continuous output is the only way to go
100% Stabilized wave, High conductivity, and alike...
Wall plug adapter is best than batteries
Stain less steel is better
2.5kHz penetrates 3.5 better than 30kHz
If lower frequencies penetrates better, why stop at 2.5kHz?
10Hz should be close to optimum, and 0Hz is certainly the best frequency!! No? Why!?
Well, 9V 0Hz is another way to define a naked 9V battery.
If you are selling zappers, this one will not make you rich!
I never had any proof, theoretical calculation or formula or answer on this one.
Please, read Frequency_5 > Skin effect to have a real answer
There is a skin effect, but it doesn't apply to zappers...
If lower frequencies penetrates better, why stop at 2.5kHz?
10Hz should be close to optimum, and 0Hz is certainly the best frequency!! No? Why!?
Well, 9V 0Hz is another way to define a naked 9V battery.
If you are selling zappers, this one will not make you rich!
I never had any proof, theoretical calculation or formula or answer on this one.
Please, read Frequency_5 > Skin effect to have a real answer
There is a skin effect, but it doesn't apply to zappers...
Mine does blood electrification
Mine does electroporation
Mine does Aura expansion
Life time warranties
Only one frequency is better
More to come
Legal disclaimer :
We do not prescribe, diagnose, or make any medical claim or advices.
The principles, assumptions or theories exposed here have no medical or scientific value officially recognized.
Please note that Dr Clark’s books or devices have not been evaluated by Health Canada (Canada) or Food and Drugs Administration (USA), and then, have not received any guarantee on their effectiveness or their safety.
Zappers can only be sold or used as experimental devices for educational research. They are not intended for use in the cure, treatment, prevention, diagnostic of any disease.
If illness is an issue, please consult a licensed health professional before attempting any self health program.
By using this information without the approval of a licensed health professional, you are prescribing for yourself, as permitted by law, and you take full responsibility for the results.
These results may vary depending on individuals
We do not prescribe, diagnose, or make any medical claim or advices.
The principles, assumptions or theories exposed here have no medical or scientific value officially recognized.
Please note that Dr Clark’s books or devices have not been evaluated by Health Canada (Canada) or Food and Drugs Administration (USA), and then, have not received any guarantee on their effectiveness or their safety.
Zappers can only be sold or used as experimental devices for educational research. They are not intended for use in the cure, treatment, prevention, diagnostic of any disease.
If illness is an issue, please consult a licensed health professional before attempting any self health program.
By using this information without the approval of a licensed health professional, you are prescribing for yourself, as permitted by law, and you take full responsibility for the results.
These results may vary depending on individuals
Certain Internet sites associate zapper and serious illness.
It is not our role to make such assertions.
Illness does not interest us.
We leave it to the experts of the unhealthy states.
We are only interested to feel better, which is highly subjective, and to get rid of as much “invaders” who drain our resources, as possible.
These invaders, who live at our expense, we name them under the generic name of “parasites”.
We experience the influence of the zapper effect
on these parasites, on a hypothetical and empirical basis, which have nothing to do with medical or scientific rules.
It is not our role to make such assertions.
Illness does not interest us.
We leave it to the experts of the unhealthy states.
We are only interested to feel better, which is highly subjective, and to get rid of as much “invaders” who drain our resources, as possible.
These invaders, who live at our expense, we name them under the generic name of “parasites”.
We experience the influence of the zapper effect
on these parasites, on a hypothetical and empirical basis, which have nothing to do with medical or scientific rules.
This is an excerpt of a comparison between two popular zappers: Maestro-Zapper MZ3b and UZ.
You will find the original in this page : http://www.maestro-zapper.com/e_mz3b_comparison.html
You will find the original in this page : http://www.maestro-zapper.com/e_mz3b_comparison.html